Having hacked together a bulk uploader for
nbgallery and uploaded the TM351 notebooks to a test environment, I’m now in a position to start having a play with it.
All public notebooks are searchable, so how does the search fare?
The search box top right gets a little bit lost in the search results listing. It could be handy to at least print out the search string (“Searching for: …”) at the top of the results list, if not making the search box larger and in a more central location. The search results themselves take the form of the name / description/tag of each hit (i.e. the notebook metadata) along with a fragment showing how the search terms appeared in context within the notebook.
Some of my earlier experiments on notebook search here and here also show context.
A range of options are provided for ordering the results. Trending looks like it could be interesting (this is based on recent views, presumably), for example where students are searching notebooks relevant to the current week’s study.
That said, we can also display notebooks by tag, so it’s easy enough to display notebooks associated with a particular week’s study if we tag notebooks by study week:
(One thing I noticed zooming out on the page to grab the above screenshot is that the font size of the notebook titles doesn’t seem to respond to the zoom level; it would probably be worth checking to see if there are other accessibility issues.)
If we click through on a result, we see a list of related notebooks followed by a preview of the notebook. (
nbgallery strips out all cell outputs on upload, so no cell outputs are displayed).
To search through the preview, we can use a normal browser in-page search (
A range of options are provided to support community activity around a notebook for logged in users, including the ability to “star” a notebook, provide feedback or add a comment:
Logged in users can also click on the notebook tags to edit them.
Via the Further options menu, users can view various notebook metrics, email a notebook, or propose a change request:
The metrics available include number of views, runs, stars and the edit history.
If comments have been provided, the number indicator by the comment flag shows how many comments have been received, although this only appears on the notebook page. There doesn’t appear to be an indicator of how many comments are associated with a notebook on the search results page, nor did I spot a general “recent comments” feed anywhere.
When you post a comment, there is no indication that you have done so and the form remains in place. You need to close it manually. (Hitting “Post Comment” again just pops up a “can’t do that” alert on the grounds that you’re trying to post a duplicate comment.)
The comments themselves look as if they are an ordered (rather than threaded) list. It also looks like any signed in used can edit anybody else’s comment?
Users who aren’t signed in can download a notebook, but not star it, comment on it, modify the tags etc.
When I tried to add feedback, I got an error:
I’m not sure if there are settings I need to tweak to address that?
Logged in users can also run a notebook from
nbgallery via an associated notebook server. (I’d prefer it if the Run in Jupyter flash wasn’t displayed if there isn’t a linked notebook server available for the logged in user.) For example, running a notebook server on port 443 on the same host as
nbgallery using the
nbgallery notebook container:
docker run --rm -p 443:443 -e "NBGALLERY_URL=http://localhost:3000" -e "NBGALLERY_CONFIG_TOKEN=letmein" nbgallery/jupyter-alpine
starts a notebook server with the
nbgallery extension pre-installed.
We can view the notebook server homepage on
https://localhost:443 and log into it using the token-as-password
letmein. Running the container in the way described above also gives permission for the
nbgallery server running in on
http://localhost:3000 to open notebooks via the notebook server.
nbgallery itself, a logged in user can associate one of more Jupyter environments via the user menu:
Each environment is given a name and the URL of the associated notebook server (in this case,
When a notebook server is associated with a user, notebooks can be opened from
nbgallery within the notebook server.
If we create a new notebook in the linked notebook server, we can upload it to
nbgallery, adding a title, description and optional tags as in a manual notebook upload step:
If we modify the notebook that is linked to one in the gallery (that is, that has been uploaded to the gallery or launched from the gallery), we can save a change to the gallery or submit a change request:
When uploading a new version, you can add tags but not additional comments such as a commit message:
Viewing the notebook details in
nbgallery, we can see a summary of the change history:
We can also click through to a preview of each version of the notebook:
(The revision number doesn’t appear in the change history though, so it can be hard to reconcile a particular version with it’s appearance in the change history listing.)
A logged in user can make a change request to someone else’s notebooks by uploading a new version of them or by opening the notebook in the linked notebook server and submitting a change request:
When I submitted the change request, I got an error form in response, but it looks like the change request was made, as this listing of Change Requests from the user menu suggests:
An exclamation mark by the user menu also identifies that change requests are pending.
Viewing the change request provides a view over the current version of the notebook and the proposed changes. Notebooks can be viewed alongside each other or the diffs can be viewed:
The thumbs up/down indicators are used to accept or deny a change request, along with a brief comment:
Accepted changed notebooks are used to replace the current version of the notebook, and the change logged in the change history. Denied change requests are recorded as such in the change requests list, with a link to the version of the notebook containing the unsuccessfully proposed changes:
If feedback was provided, a comment icon identifies its presence and pops up the feedback in a tooltip when hovered over.
Health stats for linked and run notebooks are supposed to be available, but I couldn’t get those to work (as far as the health stat reports were concerned, the notebooks were never run no matter how many times I ran them), so maybe I’m missing something there in the setup too? [UPDATE: health settings run with a flag set: notebook instrumentation docs; specifically,
-e NBGALLERY_ENABLE_INSTRUMENTATION=1 in the docker command line.]
I’m not sure how well this would work for managing TM351 notebooks compared to out current Github workflow (which I should write up somewhere). The error responses (whether they’re valid or not) for change requests and feedback are confusing, and I’m not sure how the feedback is handled if and when it works. Not being able to easily spot new comments easily (unless I’m missing something) could be a bit of a pain. That said, the proof would be in the testing-through-use, so I’ll maybe give it a week or two’s trial with some of my own notebook workflows.
nbgallery with notebooks runnable by students without them having to log in to it. It could also be useful if notebooks could be run ‘inline’ from the notebook preview pages, for example using something like ThebeLab or Voila, particularly if a particular Binderhub repo / config could be specified in metadata somewhere.